Purple Pitchfork
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • About Chris
  • Farming Resources from Chris
  • Donate

All I Can Do

3/17/2016

3 Comments

 
Three thoughts on life:
  • A complaint is just a project waiting for definition;
  • Always ask yourself, “What’s my end game?”’ and
  • All I can do is all I can do.

These are three hard lessons to learn, and even harder lessons to accept. Trust me. I speak from experience.

Given some developments in the non-Purple Pitchfork areas of my life, I’m taking a hard look at these lessons, and I’m making some adjustments to Purple Pitchfork, at least for the time being.

I’m going to take a break from writing essays for this weekly newsletter. As much as I enjoy doing the work, and as much as I’ve heard that you value it, it’s more than I can do right now. I expect that I’ll still kick out the occasional essay, perhaps with some longer pieces, and maybe things will change again in a way that allows me to resume the weekly rhythm of writing.

We’ll still be in touch with podcast information. And I’m still planning to get a podcast out every Thursday, too.

3 Comments

My New Farmer to Farmer Podcast

3/5/2015

0 Comments

 
I'm so excited that I wanted to put that in all caps!

Last Friday, we did a soft launch of my new Farmer to Farmer Podcast, and now we're ready to share it with the world!

You can subscribe and download on iTunes, or, for the Android-inclined, get it on Stitcher.


For over twenty-five years in the organic and local farming business, I've benefited tremendously from farmers sharing their knowledge, stories, and inspiration with me. It's what inspired me to work with the MOSES Organic Farming Conference for over thirteen years, and it made me a better farmer at every step of the way.

I created the Farmer to Farmer Podcast to provide a fresh and honest look at what it takes to make your farm work, from a variety of perspectives. The show features down-to-earth conversations with experienced farmers - and the occasional non-farmer - about everything from soil fertility and record-keeping to getting your crops to market without making yourself crazy. In the episodes I've recorded so far, we've talked about everything from employment philosophy and the best techniques for weed control in carrots to making your way as an organic vegetable farmer in the heart of conventional corn and soybean country.

We've already published episodes with Liz Graznak, Lisa Kivirist, Allen Philo, and John Peterson, and we've got more great guests lined up and on the way.

Please take a listen, and leave a review on iTunes or Stitcher (or both, if you really love it!) - your ratings and reviews are a critical part of moving the Farmer to Farmer Podcast up in the lists and search results, and help me get the Farmer to Farmer Podcast out to more people.

From the reviews on iTunes:

  • This is the type of farming podcast I have been looking for. It provides valuable insight into other operations and the minds of their operators. Chris is an excellent host and his decades of experience allow him to ask the perfect questions to provide a valuable and informative interview with talented and wise growers. Thanks to Chris for putting together such an amazing resource for growers, new and veteran.

  • Honestly, I found myself laughing out loud, shedding a tear (thanks, Liz!), and wishing I wasn't driving so I could take notes, as I listened to this podcast. It is the perfect mix of farmer's stories along with practical, usable knowledge for new and established farmers alike. Great job, Chris. We want more!

0 Comments

The Ruminant Podcast - Culinary Herb Production

2/4/2015

0 Comments

 
Jordan Marr at The Ruminant was kind enough to have me on his podcast recently for two episodes talking about successful culinary herb production in a farm operation.  In the first episode, I make the case for focusing on herbs, and discusses the proper sourcing, and subsequent propagation, of herb cuttings.  In the second episode, I talk about how to harvest herbs in a way that strikes a balance between high production and low labor costs.

Episode 34 - Part 1
Episode 35 - Part 2

0 Comments

FSMA Comment Deadline Approaching Fast

12/4/2014

2 Comments

 
The comment period for the revised proposed Produce Rule for the Food Safety Modernization Act closes Monday, December 15. And the FDA needs to hear from you.

The good news? The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition has made it ridiculously straightforward to comment on the rule. They have a complete guide to the process, and even a Word document template that you can use to guide your comments. Everything you need is right here: sustainableagriculture.net/fsma/speak-out-today/

The other piece of good news? The voices of farmers and farm supporters made a huge difference during the original comment period – enough so that the FDA took the relatively rare step of making major revisions to their proposal and then re-opening the comment period. We need to make a similar impression this time around – the new proposal is a substantial improvement over the previous proposal, but it still has some serious flaws.

If you raise fresh produce, think you might want to raise fresh produce in the future, or just want access to locally grown fresh produce from real family farms, it is imperative that you take the time to comment on the rule. We’re going to have to live with these regulations for decades to come – the last major revision to the nation’s food safety regulations was in 1938 – so go now to sustainableagriculture.net/fsma/speak-out-today/ and use their great information and tools to make your comments.

There are plenty of issues to address in the proposed Produce Rule, but here are my top four:

Farms should be defined by their activities, not by ownership or geography.

The proposed definition of a farm – which keeps an operation or activity from being regulated under the far-more-stringent rules for processing – should be based on common sense and risk-based distinctions.

The current proposal would define a farm as being under “one ownership” and in “one general physical location.” This lacks clarity and common sense – my own farm utilized two different parcels more than three miles apart, but that certainly did not increase my food safety risk. Neither does owning the property where you grow your produce while leasing a packing shed on a different piece of property nearby.

These are not the science-based regulations that congress called for when it passed the Food Safety Modernization Act. Farms come in all different shapes and sizes and all kinds of ownership structures; the Food Safety Modernization Act needs to accommodate the creativity that farmers use in meeting their resource needs. Anything less threatens the survival of current operations, and creates tremendous barriers to entry for beginning farmers.

Farm activities are farm activities, regardless of where they happen,

The proposed rule regulates the same activity differently depending on where it happens. If you wash your produce, trim outer leaves, or put stickers on your watermelons on your farm, that’s considered to be “farming.” If you do the same activities on your neighbor’s farm, that’s also considered to be farming. But if you wash your produce in a packing house that isn’t on a farm, that’s considered to be processing or manufacturing, and falls under additional regulations.

If washing produce doesn’t present a public  health risk when it’s done on a farm, there’s no reason that it should present a public health risk when it’s done off the farm. This rule would stand in the way of the development of multi-farm CSAs, food hubs, and even farmers markets.

Testing surface water isn’t necessarily connected to safety.

The FDA has backed off of the crazy requirements for water testing that were present in the original proposal, but they are still asking farmers to test surface water 20 times per year to establish a baseline risk threshold.

Tests would indicate how long farmers need to wait between applying overhead irrigation and harvesting produce, based on… well, here’s what the FDA has to say: 

For example, if you determined (using the procedures described in proposed §§ 112.45(b) or 112.45(c), as applicable), that your agricultural water which is to be used for the purposes described in § 112.44(c) has generic E. coli levels with a GM value of 241 CFU per 100 mL and a STV value of 576 CFU per 100 mL, your water would not meet the microbial quality specified in § 112.44(c), in that your values exceed both the GM value of 126 CFU per 100 mL and STV value of 410 CFU or less per 100 mL. Under proposed § 112.44(c)(1), you would be able to use this water by applying a calculated time interval of 1 day between your last irrigation event (by direct application method) and harvest of the crop. Using a microbial reduction rate of 0.5 log per day, a 1-day time interval would be sufficient to meet the microbial quality requirements specified in § 112.44(c) because it would reduce your GM and STV values to 76 CFU per 100 mL and 182 CFU per 100 mL, respectively.

Do you really want to try to figure that out in August?

Instead, FDA should implement the common-sense solution used by growers and recommended by Cornell University – a several day wait between overhead irrigation and harvest, or cleaning crops with water treated with a wash-water sanitizer, multiple fresh water rinses, or a flowing rinse. The science backs this up, and it’s an easily implemented solution.

Not regulating raw manure use right now is just crazy.

The FDA has proposed to delay the creation of a new standard for raw manure management. This makes sense – I’ve reviewed the research and it is not clear what the appropriate pre-harvest application interval would be. But the research is clear on one thing – the organic standard for raw manure application makes sense. Let’s go with the very workable, very safe 120-day waiting period if the edible portion is in contact with the ground, and 90 days if it isn’t.

Now, go.

Seriously. This is important. Go right now to sustainableagriculture.net/fsma/speak-out-today/ and follow their easy instructions.

2 Comments
    Picture

    Sponsors

    img_purple pitchfork_sponsor_vermont compost

    Archives

    2016
    2015

    2014
    2013
    2012
    2011

    Announcement
    Business Philosophy
    Business Strategy
    CSA
    Entrepreneurism
    Farm Equipment
    Farm Finances
    Farming Techniques
    Farm Labor
    Farm Systems
    Farm Wisdom
    Food Safety
    Government
    Health
    Irrigation
    Management
    Marketing
    Organic Certification
    Organic Farming
    Organization
    Pricing
    Records Management
    Scaling Up
    Value

    Picture

    RSS Feed

Picture
Purple Pitchfork is a project of Renewing the Countryside, a non-profit dedicated to rural revitalization and collaborative farmer education that serves as the home for these resources Chris Blanchard created.
Copyright © 2018, Purple Pitchfork. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy